Open season on your property
I don't normally comment on local stories here in Indy, but this
disgusting story deserves comment:
Burglaries surge 25% in area
$14 million in property was stolen in IPD area in 2004; only
$607,000 was recovered
Andrew Scott, 29, returned to his Far-Westside home after work to
find crooks had jimmied a window and taken his digital camera and a
jewelry box.
Wes Johnson, 57, was gone for about an hour when burglars broke a
window, entered his Northeastside home and made off with a Sony
PlayStation and other valuables.
Helores Grimsley, 81, had a kerosene heater and checks stolen from
her Near-Southside garage and home while she was asleep.
Those three incidents last week are among the most recent in a wave
of burglaries, which have increased more than 25 percent since 2000
in Marion and Hamilton counties.
As national and statewide rates remained flat from 2000 to 2004,
burglaries surged in Greenfield, Noblesville and many other
communities across the metro area
.
Drug use, the added opportunities provided by a growing population
and, one expert said, early releases from the Marion County Jail
helped drive the increase.
Burglaries are among the toughest crimes to crack, with 14 of every
100 IPD cases solved and about $4 of every $100 in stolen property
recovered. The losses reported in TVs, jewelry, tools and other
possessions amounted to nearly $14 million in the Indianapolis
Police Department area in 2004.
People need to be concerned about the rise, according to Jason
Hutchens, a deputy director for the Indiana Criminal Justice
Institute, a state planning agency. Burglaries, Hutchens said, are
often a gateway crime from which offenders graduate to more violent
offenses.
"These people are violent," Hutchens said. "I think there's a
perception by some to treat drug offenders, burglars and people
doing certain property crimes as nonviolent offenders, and that's
just not what the criminal history and research shows."
Burglaries in Greenfield doubled from 2000 to 2004, according to
the federal Bureau of Justice Statistics. Indianapolis police
investigated 28 percent more burglaries in 2004 than in 2000.
Noblesville also saw a steep increase, with 48 percent more
burglaries over the same period.
Even after adjusting for population growth in several areas, the
rate of burglaries increased. In Noblesville, for example, the rate
was up 27 percent -- to 40 burglaries per 10,000 residents in 2004,
compared with nearly 32 per 10,000 in 2000. The IPD burglary rate
was 136 per 10,000 people in 2004.
IPD Maj. Lloyd Crowe said it will take the help of the public to
reduce the burglary rate.
"What people need to be is vigilant," he said. "It takes a
collaboration between the neighborhoods and the police."
The trend reflects just how difficult it is to catch a burglar,
police say. Without a witness, DNA or fingerprints, the crime
becomes impossible to prosecute.
Many burglars are stealing to support a drug habit, police say.
Meth was almost unknown in Indiana a decade ago, and as recently as
2000 police broke up fewer than 500 labs making the drug. But by
2004, the number had soared to more than 1,500.
New laws make it harder to set up a home meth lab, but police say
users are likely turning to other sources for the drug.
Addicts tend to be disorganized and prolific burglars, IPD Sgt.
Lloyd Walker said.
"The lust of the drug is just so severe that they don't worry about
being caught," Walker said. In the time it takes police to gather
and process evidence from one crime scene, Walker said a desperate
burglar can hit four or five more homes.
Criminologists also say an economy that has more people living in
poverty affects burglary rates. In Indiana, more than 516,000
people enrolled for food stamps in 2004, up 74 percent from 2000.
And the growth in areas such as Johnson and Hamilton counties
offers burglars more chances to act.
"I think we have always been a target," said Hamilton County
Sheriff's Detective Todd Uhrick. "People here do typically enjoy a
higher standard of living, which means they've got more stuff."
Marion County officials have struggled for decades to solve
crowding problems at the jail. To avoid violating a federal court
order, judges have released more than 10,000 inmates early since
2001.
Six of those released prisoners have gone on to be accused or
convicted of murder, but the question of how many have committed
lesser crimes after their release has drawn little attention.
"It's the same folks over and over," said Hutchens. "Twenty percent
of the criminals do 80 percent of the crime." (emphasis mine)
As a victim of both burglary and auto theft, I believe some comments
are in order:
1. I dealt with this issue in an earlier post. Law was originally
intended to protect order in a civilized society -- life, liberty and
property. It has morphed to protecting only life. Property is no
longer protected. Disagree with me? The cold numbers in this story
tell the tale: $14 million in property stolen, only $607,000
recovered; 14 of every 100 cases solved. Police cannot prevent or
solve these crimes. People are discouraged from defending their
property because it would threaten life -- that of the criminal. This
is unacceptable. The solution here is putting more police on the
street, but then we have ...
2. The meth labs. The police statement that many burglars are trying
to support a drug habit is illustrative of the ineffectiveness --
indeed, counterproductivity -- of the war against illegal drugs. We
don't want people cooking up meth in home labs -- for one thing, it's
not safe and can blow up the home, injuring the people involved. So we
make it more difficult to make meth -- better enforcement and banning
the OTC sale of certain cold medications used to make meth. Now, they
can't make meth in their homes and have to go to drug dealers for it,
which is more expensive. As a result, they have to resort to crimes
such as burglary and auto theft.
So, as a result of these new laws, instead of meth users killing
themselves by blowing up their own homes, they are burglarizing
everyone else's. Brilliant!
3. Jail Overcrowding. I've also commented on this before. The Star
won't touch it, not in the way it needs to be touched anyway. A
certain federal judge here has determined, at the behest of the ACLU,
that the Marion County Jail is overcrowded. The dangerous criminals
are a li'l uncomfortable, it would seem. A federal court order has set
a cap on the number of inmates. As a result, inmates get released all
the time.
So, instead of our jail being "overcrowded" with criminals, our
streets are now overcrowded with criminals, just waiting to pay a
No comments:
Post a Comment