Relief Package
As news that Rafael Betancourt and the Indians have avoided the ugly
process of "exchanging numbers" and the ensuing negotiations by buying
out Senor Slo-Mo's arbitration years, to the tune of a 2 year deal
worth $5.4M, as well as the Indians holding a club option ($5M) for
what would have been Betancourt's first year of Free Agency (2010),
the Indians have further cemented their roster going forward by
ensuring that Betancourt remains in the fold for at least another 2
years.
In light of the recent deals meted out to relievers on the Free Agent
market (and realizing that a the situation of a player like
Betancourt, who was under the club's control for two more years even
before this deal due to his Major League service time, is completely
different than a player on the open market), the real coup in the deal
is the CLUB option for the 3rd year for only $5M. The protection that
the Indians retain in the chance that Betancourt's effectiveness wanes
in the first or second year (knocking firmly on wood) is something
that cannot be undervalued in the highly volatile world of relievers,
much less elite set-up men.
To wit, realizing that the "Hold" is a fairly new statistic (wherefore
art thou, GW RBI), it does measure the ability of a reliever to "hold"
a lead and transfer to a closer. While better, more complicated,
measures of relievers exist; for our purposes, consider the top hold
leaders from just the last few years:
2007
Brandon Lyon - ARI - 35
Heath Bell - SD - 34
Derrick Turnbow - MIL - 33
Jon Rauch - WAS - 33
Jonathon Broxton - LAD - 33
Rafael Betancourt - CLE - 31
2006
Scott Linebrink - SD - 36
Scot Shields - LAA - 31
Joel Zumaya - DET - 30
Aaron Heilman - NYM - 27
Juan Rincon - MIN - 26
Scott Proctor - NYY - 26
2005
Scot Shields - ANA - 33
Tom Gordon - NYY - 33
Scott Eyre - SF - 32
Ryan Madsen - PHI - 32
Julian Tavarez - StL - 32
Bob Howry - CLE - 29
2004
Tom Gordon - NYY - 36
Akinori Otsuka - SD - 34
Ray King - StL - 31
Chris Reitsma - ATL - 31
Salomon Torres - PIT - 30
Guillermo Mota - LAD/FLA - 30
2003
Octavio Dotel - HOU - 33
Brendan Donnelly - ANA - 29
Jason Grimsley - KC - 28
Paul Quantrill - LAD - 28
LaTroy Hawkins - MIN - 28
Tom Martin - LAD - 28
The lists, which contain few of the same names from year to year,
illustrate how relievers remain a volatile commodity and one that
really can't be counted on from one year to the next. The problem with
giving these players long-term deals (which is what they're demanding
now on the open market...even the marginal ones) is that if they do
regress, they are virtually unmovable and simply take up a spot in the
bullpen that could be filled by a more promising youngster cashing a
much smaller paycheck. It speaks to the importance of developing your
own players (whether they be relievers or otherwise) into MLB players,
as opposed to potentially overpaying for an extremely unstable
commodity.
Overpaying, you say?
How about the fact that the Brewers committed a combined $23M to Eric
Gagne and David Riske, while the South Siders gave Scott Linebrink a
4-year deal for $19M and Octavio Dotel a 2-year deal for $11M this
off-season in an attempt to fortify their bullpens. All are decent
pitchers, but none jump out as legitimate closers or even are would be
guaranteed to be viable set-up men for THIS season. However, with the
Brewers and White Sox bullpens being major question marks, with no
internal alternatives to exhaust, Milwaukee and Chicago simply
obtained the pitchers that they felt would best help their team,
regardless of cost.
Conversely, with the Indians boasting the likes of Rafael Perez,
Jensen Lewis, and Tom Mastny (with more young arms on the way), it
would seem that the Tribe will finally see some permanent help for
their bullpen coming up from the farm to stay, which puts them in the
enviable position of not having to explore the FA market as they have
in years past with...shall we say...mixed results. Having those
youngsters fill the pipeline at known salary numbers and with options
remaining in case of a regression is a luxury that cannot be
underestimated for a team that knows all too well what a Jose Jimenez
or Roberto Hernandez can (or more accurately, cannot) do.
But back to the impetus for the discussion, the deal for our presiding
judge of the bullpen (you know, because "Betancourt is in Session")
and the importance of the length of the deal. Some may argue that the
Indians should have included another option year or guaranteed the 3rd
year with a 4th year club option. However, it is important to remember
that Betancourt is no spring chicken due to his career starting as an
infielder (he was a 21-year-old SS for the Michigan Battle Cats),
spending some time in the Pacific Rim, and overcoming arm injuries
before finally settling in with the Tribe.
Betancourt will be 33 this year and 35 in the club option year,
meaning that the Indians would have been guaranteeing that 4th year to
a 36-year-old in 2011. To give that some proper perspective, consider
that everyone's favorite whipping boy, that "washed up, over-the-hill"
closer of ours, The Big Borowski, turned 36 this past May. Given the
volatility of relievers and the variables that seem to affect
relievers more than most, the 4th year is simply unnecessary.
But don't let that explanation of why including the 4th year in the
contract overwhelm the fact that the Indians re-signed (arguably) the
most effective reliever in the AL last year, locking in a set salary
for his two arbitration years and possibly buying out his first year
of Free Agency. The deal further solidifies the bullpen, as well as
the whole roster, for the short-term and the long-term as the Indians
lock in another piece to the puzzle for the foreseeable future...and
No comments:
Post a Comment