The 100 Greatest Royals of All-Time
#96 Jason Grimsley
Jason Grimsley spent three and a half seasons as a reliever for the
Royals, and during that time was considered their most dependable
reliever which tells you more about the Royals bullpen at that time
than Grimsley himself.
Throughout his career, Jason Grimsley was a pretty wild reliever. Upon
observation, I think it was due to his heavy sinker, which he seemed
to have little control over, but which could be devastating when
thrown near the strike zone. In an April game in 1991 for the
Phillies, he uncorked four wild pitches in one inning. Later that
month, he set a MLB record by throwing a wild pitch in his ninth
consecutive game. He finished third in the NL in wild pitches, despite
throwing just 61 innings. He was then traded to Houston for Curt
Schilling. Straight up. Let that sink in for a second.
Grimsley bounced around from the Astros to the Indians where he was
pretty terrible for some pretty good Indians teams. His greatest value
lay in protecting slugger Albert Belle. In 1994, White Sox manager
Gene Lamont suspected Belle of using a corked bat. The umpires
confiscated Belle's bat in the umpire room to be examined by the
league office. But the bat was clean and Belle was never reprimanded.
In 1999, Grimsley finally revealed that he took a clean bat from
teammate Paul Sorrento and climbed through an escape hatch in the
ceiling of the clubhouse, crawled to the umpire room, and switched out
the bats.
''I was asked whether I would tell the story if there would be no
repercussions,'' Grimsley said. ''I figured it was about time.''
The Indians dealt him to the Angels in 1996. After an awful year for
the Angels, he signed with the Tigers, who released him before the
season even began. The Brewers signed him to their minor leagues, but
after a 5.70 ERA in AAA they dealt him to the Royals for P Jaime
Brewington. The Royals put him in Omaha where he continued to flounder
with a 6.68 ERA, so they let him go at the end of the year. He spent a
year with the Indians AAA affiliate, before signing with the Yankees,
where he magically revived his career.
In 1999, at age 31, Grimsley had the best season of his career since
his rookie season. He posted a 3.60 ERA in 75 innings for the AL
Pennant winning Yankees. He was less effective the next season as he
earned a World Championship ring with the Yankees, so they let him go.
He signed with the Royals, where he would finish in the top ten in
games pitched for the next four seasons. He was dealt to the Orioles
in 2004 for Denny Bautista.
For most of the Tony Pena era, any time a Royals pitcher got into a
jam, Pena would turn to Grimsley's help. During the Royals magical
2003 season, Pena turned to Grimsley 76 times, leading Jason to finish
third in the league in relief appearances. Grimsley had a 4.14 ERA in
the first half of the season, but the wear and tear of being used so
much led him to a 7.20 ERA in the second half.
Grimsley's ERA would lead Tony Pena and many Royals observers to
conclude that of course, Grimsley was the only real option in the
bullpen for the middle innings before closer Mike MacDougal in the
9th. Relievers overall had a 5.54 ERA for the Royals. Consider the
other bullpen ERAs:
D.J. Carrasco 4.82 in 80.1 IP
Kris Wilson 5.33 in 72.2 IP
Sean Lowe 6.25 in 44.2 IP
Curtis Leskanic 1.72 in 26 IP (acquired in July)
Alan Levine 2.53 in 21.1 IP (acquired in July)
Of course Jason Grimsley was the best option in the 7th and 8th
innings, right?
Wrong.
Grimsley, quite frankly, was a matador's cape in 2003. Baseball
Prospectus has tabulated a statistic called Adjusted Runs Prevented
from Scoring (ARP). Basically its a measure of the number of runs that
a reliever prevented over an average pitcher, given the situation when
he entered and left each game, adjusted for league and park. In 2003,
676 pitchers appeared in a game (although in fairness, not all of them
appeared in relief, giving them an ARP of 0.0). Out of 676 pitchers,
Jason Grimsley was 666th. His ARP was -13, meaning that a simply
average pitcher (say for example, Ryan Dempster in 2003) would allow
13 fewer runs in similar situations as Grimsley. Among the pitchers
that were actually worse than Grimsley that year were Jose Mesa, Albie
Lopez and Jose Jimenez.
Grimsley was quite possibly historically bad in 2003. Tom Ruane at
Retrosheet.org has tried to take a "Value Added" approach to measure
how players perform in certain situations and measure how they left a
situation in comparison to how they received that situation. In "Value
Added Pitching Versus Runs Below Average", he measures how a reliever
fares in certain situations in comparison to the league average. Since
1960, Grimsley had the ninth worst season ever by a reliever in this
measure (interestingly enough, Dan Quisenberry's 1987 season is the
second worst all-time).
To be fair, it wasn't as if Tony Pena had a lot of great options until
Leskanic and Levine were acquired.
2003 ARP for Royals relievers
Leskanic 9.8
Levine 4.9
Wilson -5.2
Carrasco -5.9
Lowe -8.0
Still, Grimsley seemed to be the worst of all options. It wasn't that
Grimsley was a terrible pitcher. But he certainly wasn't nearly as
good as Pena thought he was, and was probably misused and overused.
The Royals had a pretty improbable and lucky season in 2003, but I'll
always wonder what might have happened had their manager not been
sabotaging their chances by bunting and misusing the pitching staff.
In 2006, a story surfaced that federal agents had raided Jason
Grimsley's home looking for Human Growth Hormone and other performance
enhancing drugs (PEDs). Grimsley allegedly told agents he had used
Deca-Durabolin, amphetamines, Human Growth Hormone and Clenbuterol in
1998 to recover from a shoulder injury.
MLB suspended Grimsley for 50 games, but rather than face his
suspension, Grimsley simply retired. His affadavit to federal
officials had several redacted names of other players he accused of
using PEDs, and the Los Angeles Times reported some of those names
included some of the biggest in baseball - Roger Clemens, Andy
Pettitte and Miguel Tejada.
''I was asked whether I would tell the story if there would be no
repercussions,'' Grimsley said. ''I figured it was about time.''
Jason Grimsley was never afraid to cheat so long as there were no
No comments:
Post a Comment